Parents’ Fair Share Demonstration: Data Sources

Data Sources

Source Administrative data
Title Case Control Cards (handwritten running narratives that CSE staff produce to describe their activities relating to a particular case)
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection CSE cases for 200 children.
Collected 4/91.
Sites Two urban counties in a large state.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes 187 case cards collected.
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 
Source Field Research
Title Key informant interviews and site visits
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection Interviews with line staff and supervisors in the CSE and JOBS programs and representatives of the judiciary (number in sample not reported).
Data collection schedule not reported.
Sites Two urban counties in a large state.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes Structured interview guides were used to cover a standard of topics with staff in similar positions. Discussions with staff focused on such issues as case processing procedures, employee performance evaluation methods, and typical strategies for coping with heavy workloads.
 
Source Interview
Title Qualitative data
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 32 low-income individuals (non-custodial parents).
Non-random selection of program group members.
Collected at least twice since random assignment (4/94 - 6/96).
Sites All sites.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes Fielded sample number not reported.
Additional Execution Notes Semi-structured interviews lasted 1½ hours.
Non-structured interviews lasted 5 minutes to 3 hours.
 
Source Survey
Title Baseline Information Intake Form
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 5,611 low-income individuals (non-custodial parents).
Sample of 2,918 program and 2,792 control group members.
Collected at baseline.
Sites All sites.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 
Source Administrative data
Title PFS program participation data
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 1,962 low-income individuals (non-custodial parents).
Sample of all program group members who participated in at least 1 activity.
Collected monthly after random assignment.
Sites All sites.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 
Source Administrative data
Title Earnings and child support data
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 5,611 non-custodial parents
Sites All sites.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 
Source Survey
Title Survey of custodial parents and non-custodial parents
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 2,186 custodial parents and 553 non-custodial parents.
Sites All sites.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes Reported response rates:
Custodial parents: 90.2%
Non-custodial parents: 78%
Matched pair: 78%
Additional Execution Notes Survey conducted approximately 1 year after non-custodial parents entered the study sample.