Arkansas Transitional Employment Assistance (TEA) Program

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) Berkeley Policy Associates
Investigator(s) Stephen Walsh (Berkeley Policy Associates)
Rebecca London (Berkeley Policy Associates)
 
Domain Income Security/TANF
Status Completed (final report released)
Duration Jun 1998 - Jun 1999
Type Research and/or Program Evaluation
Program/Policy Description Arkansas Transitional Employment Assistance (TEA) program has the following key welfare strategies: work requirements sooner than 24 months, lifetime limit less than 60 months, denial of TANF to drug felons, over 12 months of transitional child care after leaving TANF, family cap, diversion assistance, and subsidized employment.

To accomplish the goals of evaluating TEA implementation across the state and its effects on recipients and their families, we will conduct an evaluation with two main components: a process study and an outcomes study. The process study will address the implementation of the program at both the state and local level. Through interviews with multiple state and local respondents, client focus groups, and observation of program activities, we will document the progress of TEA implementation and how it has varied across counties in the state. We will select a random sample of counties to include in the process study, ensuring that we include counties that accurately represent the diversity of the State of Arkansas.

The outcomes study will provide an analysis of the effects if the TEA program by examining clients’ experiences with the program and their subsequent outcomes after leaving it. Linking four administrative data sets collected by the state, the outcomes study will profile clients during their TEA participation and track their post-program activities and outcomes. We will also compare TEA clients’ outcomes to those of their predecessors in the AFDC program.

Notes Visit the project website.
 
Last Updated 11/20/03
Type of Summary Unreviewed
Contact(s) Rebecca London (info@bpacal.com)
Berkeley Policy Associates
440 Grand Avenue
Suite 500
(T) (510)-465-7884
(F) (510)-465-7885
Submitter(s) Research Forum Staff (info@researchforum.org)
National Center for Children In Poverty
215 West 125th St, 3rd Fl
(T) (646)284-9600
(F) not reported

Populations Studied

Target Population Recipients/participants/clients
Former recipients ("leavers")
Subgroups Analyzed Single parent families
Two-parent families
Caseworkers/managers/administrators
Sample Size and Unit Process study: State and local stakeholders (from 75 coalitions).

Outcomes study: Clients from old AFDC program (June 1996 to June 1997) and from beginning of TEA implementation (July 1997) through latest possible period (June 1999). Administrative records for TEA, Medicaid, Food Stamps, and Unemployment Insurance.

Execution Not yet available.
In-depth interviews with state/local level stakeholders conducted yearly.

Sites Studied

Process Study:
Marion County, Arkansas
Randolph County, Arkansas
Greene County, Arkansas
Craighead County, Arkansas
Cleburne County, Arkansas
Logan County, Arkansas
Faukner County, Arkansas
Garland County, Arkansas
Pulaski County, Arkansas
Monroe County, Arkansas
Phillips County, Arkansas
Jefferson County, Arkansas
Nevada County, Arkansas
Union County, Arkansas
Chico County, Arkansas