Understanding the AFDC/TANF Child-Only Caseload

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) Lewin Group
Investigator(s) Mary Farrell (Lewin Group)
Michael Fishman (Lewin Group)
Stephanie Laud (Lewin Group)
Vincena Allen (Lewin Group)
 
Domain Income Security/TANF
Child/Family
Status Completed (final report released)
Type Policy Analysis
Program/Policy Description “Child-only" cases, where only a child or children are receiving assistance, are not currently growing in absolute numbers but are becoming an increasing proportion of the overall TANF caseload. In 1998, child-only cases made up 23 percent of the TANF caseload nationally, ranging from 10 percent to 47 percent of state caseloads.

This project describes how federal and state policies affect child-only caseloads, discusses the national TANF and child-only caseload trends, and examines the characteristics of child-only cases.

A variety of circumstances result in child-only cases. In some cases, the child is not living with a parent, but with a relative, who chooses not to be included in the assistance unit or whose income and assets preclude him or her from receiving cash assistance. In other situations, the child is living with a parent, but the parent is a Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipient, a non-qualified alien, a qualified alien who entered the country after August 1996, a sanctioned adult, or otherwise excluded.

State TANF policies affect the number and composition of child-only cases; five policies in particular are worth noting: sanction policy, alien policy, treatment of SSI, non-parental caregivers, and time-limit policy. In addition, many states are creating alternative programs for relative caregivers, offering higher payments than TANF, which may result in a shift of cases from TANF into the alternative programs. Depending on state financing choices, these cases mayor may not be counted as TANF child-only cases.

The characteristics of child-only cases vary across states, counties, and type of caregiver (for example, parent versus non-parent). Demographics and policy choices in each state and county affect the characteristics and composition of the child-only caseload.

Notes No notes reported.
 
Last Updated 04/19/00
Type of Summary Unreviewed
Contact(s) Kristen Rybandt (not reported)
Lewin Group
3130 Fairview Park Drive
Suite 800
(T) (703) 269-5721
(F) not reported
Submitter(s) Research Forum Staff (info@researchforum.org)
National Center for Children In Poverty
215 West 125th St, 3rd Fl
(T) (646)284-9600
(F) not reported

Populations Studied

Target Population Children
Child-only cases
Subgroups Analyzed Non-custodial parents
Caseworkers/managers/administrators
Sample Size and Unit State and county officials and staff were interviewed, case file reviews in one county in each state were conducted, and administrative data were analyzed.
Execution Not reported.

Sites Studied

California, Florida, Missouri