|
4,610 families who volunteered for MTO were randomly assigned into one of three groups:
MTO treatment group, (N=1,8203,170) which received section 8 certificates or vouchers useable only in low-poverty areas (areas with less than 10% of the population below the poverty line), along with counseling and assistance in finding a rental unit. 860 families (48%) successfully leased units in low-poverty neighborhoods.
Section 8 comparison group, (N=1,6501,350) which received regular section 8 certificates or vouchers (geographically unrestricted) and whatever briefings and assistance Section 8 certificate and voucher recipients would normally receive from the housing authority. 816 families (60%) successfully leased units.
In-place control group, (N=1,440) which received no certificates or vouchers but continued to receive project-based assistance.
NOTE: MTO was designed as a major social science improvement over earlier research that failed to address the problem of self-selection bias: that if only the most motivated families are included or selected to join a program, their experiences will not be typical of the eligible population and will confound or confuse outcomes. MTO addresses the self-selection issue buy randomly assigning families who volunteered for the MTO program into one of the three groups.
|