Extended-Service Schools Initiative

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) Public/Private Ventures
MDRC
Investigator(s) Jean Baldwin Grossman (Public/Private Ventures)
 
Domain Child/Family
Community/Neighborhood
Status Completed (final report released)
Duration May 1998 - Jun 2002
Type Research and/or Program Evaluation
Program/Policy Description The Extended-Service Schools (ESS) Initiative, which supported the creation of 60 after school programs in 20 communities around the country, was designed to provide opportunities for youth in their after-school time. Each community adapted one of four national models: Beacon, Bridges to Success, Community Schools, and West Philadelphia Improvement Corporation. The ESS Initiative evaluation focused on four central questions:
1. Which children and youth came to the after-school programs? Why did they come? Were the programs attracting the young people who could most benefit from participation?
2. What were the characteristics of high-quality activities in these programs--activities that promoted the positive development of the children and youth who attended?
3. What benefits did the children and youth gain from participation?
4. What was the cost to operate the after-school programs, and what were the ways to finance them?
Notes No notes reported.
 
Last Updated 10/29/02
Type of Summary Unreviewed
Contact(s) Jean Baldwin Grossman (not reported)
Public/Private Ventures
2000 Market Street
Suite 600
(T) (215) 557-4400
(F) (215) 557-4469
Submitter(s) Research Forum Staff (info@researchforum.org)
National Center for Children In Poverty
215 West 125th St, 3rd Fl
(T) (646)284-9600
(F) not reported

Populations Studied

Target Population Children
Subgroups Analyzed Local government
Teachers
Children 7-18
Neighborhood-based community organizations
Sample Size and Unit Student Survey: N=1708 enrollees who completed at least one day of ESS.
Parent Survey: N=221 telephone interviews.
Activity Observations: N=30 activities observed in 3 middle schools.
Execution Student Survey: Baseline response rate-69% (N=786)
Follow up response rate-87% (N=674)
Completed baseline and follow up N=371

Sites Studied

Beacon:
Denver, CO
Minneapolis, MN
Oakland, CA
Savannah, GA

Bridges to Success:
Flint, MI
Missoula, MT
Greensboro, NC
Philadelphia, PA
Jacksonville, FL
Central Falls, RI
Mesa, AZ

Community Schools:
Boston, MA
Long Beach, CA
Salt Lake City, UT

West Philadelphia Improvement Corporation:
Albuquerque, NM
Atlanta, GA
Aurora, CO
Birmingham, AL
Denver, CO
Lexington, KY