Maryland Family Investment Program (FIP) Evaluation

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) Maryland Department of Human Resources
Investigator(s) Catherine Born (University of Maryland)
 
Domain Income Security/TANF
Status Completed with continuing analysis
Duration Oct 1996 - Jan 2002
Type Research and/or Program Evaluation
Program/Policy Description Maryland's Family Investment Program (FIP) is cohort-specific, investment-focused, and within broad state parameters, locally crafted. The approach was developed largely from state-level research showing that welfare recipients are a diverse group and that client characteristics and welfare receipt patterns vary across jurisdictions. Thus, under FIP, local agencies have the flexibility to develop FIP procedures that meet their specific needs. However, certain elements of FIP are standard statewide. For example, cash assistance grant levels are the same across the state. All local agencies must have client assessment procedures, enter into client-agency agreements, utilize welfare avoidance grants (WAGS) and meet program savings targets set through a formula developed by local and state staff.

The evaluation is designed to document how workers are making allocation decisions in a representative state's 24 jurisdictions, examine the relationship between allocations decisions and client and county-level TANF outcomes, and consider the role of county economic and agency characteristics in predicting client and county TANF outcomes.

Notes No notes reported.
 
Last Updated 10/02/03
Type of Summary Unreviewed
Contact(s) Catherine Born (cborn@ssw.umaryland.edu)
University of Maryland
550 West Baltimore Street
(T) (410) 706-5134
(F) (410) 706-2760
Submitter(s) Research Forum Staff (info@researchforum.org)
National Center for Children In Poverty
215 West 125th St, 3rd Fl
(T) (646)284-9600
(F) not reported

Populations Studied

Target Population Recipients/participants/clients
Subgroups Analyzed None
Sample Size and Unit Sample 1: 5% random sample of new certifications to be drawn monthly over a 12 month period. (About 200 families in each month).

Sample 2: Random sample of new certifications in 6-8 matched county or district offices

Sample 3: Random subsample of 250 families drawn from sample 1

Sample 4: Random subsample of 50 Baltimore families drawn from sample 1

Execution Not reported

Sites Studied

Maryland - statewide