http://www.researchforum.org/project_general_136.html

Rural Impacts of Welfare Reform

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) University of Wisconsin
Investigator(s) Gene F. Summers (University of Wisconsin)
 
Domain Income Security/TANF
Community/Neighborhood
Status Completed with continuing analysis
Duration Oct 1997 - Sep 1999
Type Research and/or Program Evaluation
Program/Policy Description The University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Rural Sociology and the United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service are collaborating to monitor the impacts of the 1996 welfare reform legislation in several rural counties that have consistently high rates of poverty. The project will use national, state, and county level data to monitor changes in indicators that are likely to show short-term and long-term impacts of welfare reform on welfare program participation, employment, health, and other indicators of individual, family, and community well-being. This project will assist the USDA in assessing the underlying causes of rural poverty, the socioeconomic conditions of people living in nonmetropolitan areas, and the effects of policies designed to improve those conditions.
Notes No notes reported.
 
Last Updated 10/06/98
Type of Summary Unreviewed
Contact(s) Mark Harvey (mharvey@ssc.wisc.edu)
University of Wisconsin
Department of Rural Sociology
1450 Linden Drive
(T) (608) 263-9728
(F) (608) 262-6022
Submitter(s) Mark Harvey (mharvey@ssc.wisc.edu)
University of Wisconsin
Department of Rural Sociology
1450 Linden Drive
(T) (608) 263-9728
(F) (608) 262-6022

Populations Studied

Target Population Recipients/participants/clients
Former recipients ("leavers")
Applicants
Rural Populations
Subgroups Analyzed Pregnant/parenting teens
Single parent families
Persons diverted from welfare
Two-parent families
Low-wage workers
Persons with substance abuse problems
Immigrants
Native Americans
Children 1-6
Local government
Social/Community service agencies
Caseworkers/managers/administrators
Employers
Sample Size and Unit County is unit of analysis.
Execution Not yet available.

Sites Studied

McCreary and Owsley Counties, Kentucky
Holmes and Sunflower Counties, Mississippi
Todd and Shannon Counties, South Dakota
Maverick and Starr Counties, Texas

Program Components, Policies, and Activities Evaluated

Employment activities

Educational activities

Financial incentives

Financial disincentives/Sanctions

Program requirements

Time limits

Family caps

Eligibility

Food stamps

Social/Support services

Diversionary activities

Post-Program activities

Variation in program components across sites? No

Outcomes Assessed

Service utilization

Sanctions

Income security

Family and relationship outcomes

Employment

Education

Community Outcomes

Substance abuse

Policy changes

Types of Studies

Type Descriptive/Analytical Study
 
Type Impact Study (Quasi-experiment with pre-post time periods)
 

Data Sources

Source Administrative data
 
Source Interview
 
Source Program descriptions and documents
 
Source Secondary data
 

Findings Available

Not Yet Available

Recommendations