|
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study
General Information
View a brief abstract of this project.
View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.
| Evaluator(s) |
Fragile Families Research Team
|
| Investigator(s) |
Sara McLanahan
(Fragile Families Research Team)
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
(Columbia University Teachers College)
Marta Tienda
(Princeton University)
Irwin Garfinkel
(Columbia School of Social Work)
|
| Sponsor(s) |
Columbia University
Princeton University
|
| Funder(s) |
Ford Foundation
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Public Policy Institute of California
Hogg Foundation
St. David's Hospital Foundation
Commonwealth Fund
Fund for New Jersey
National Institute of Child Health and Development
Foundation for Child Development
Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey
David and Lucile Packard Foundation
William T. Grant Foundation
California Healthcare Foundation
St. Vincent Hospital and Health Services
John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society at U. Penn
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Christian A. Johnson Endeavor Foundation
Kronkosky Charitable Foundation
Leon Lowenstein Foundation
|
| Subcontractor(s) |
National Opinion Research Center
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
|
| |
| Domain |
Income Security/TANF
Child/Family
Community/Neighborhood
|
| Status |
Operational with Findings
|
| Duration |
Jan 1997 - Jun 2006
|
| Type |
Research and/or Program Evaluation
|
| Goal |
To increase understanding of the conditions and capabilities of unwed parents, especially fathers.
To increase understanding of the nature of relationships between unwed mothers and fathers.
To gain greater awareness of the factors that strengthen or weaken unmarried parents' relationships).
To gain insight into the long-term consequences for parents, children, and society of new welfare regulations, stronger paternity establishment, and stricter child support enforcement.
|
| Program/Policy Description |
The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study investigates two critical prongs of the new Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA): 1) The TANF work requirements and time limits; and 2) the stricter paternity establishment and child support enforcement regulations. These two policies will be studied together along with labor market conditions since the effects are expected to be interactive. The new data will document the implementation of reform from the parents' perspective, and will reveal the extent to which parents are aware of the many rules, regulations, and incentives that are embedded in the process. Investigators will be able to examine the complicated relationships among work, welfare, child care, child support, and self-sufficiency for the population most associated with long-term welfare dependence. And, since the study will provide data across cities with diverse policy regimes and labor market conditions, it represents a step toward making causal inferences about the effects of public policies on family, processes and child well-being.
|
| Notes |
Several features of this study are unique:
While much is known about women who give birth outside of marriage, nonresident fathers are largely underrepresented in national and local surveys. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study will shed light on the relationships of these men with their children and the mothers of their children, their employment histories and earnings capacity, and tradeoffs between enforced and voluntary roles in their families.
Prior research has sought to understand the relationship between unwed mothers and fathers from the perspective of one or the other. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study will facilitate the development of models of marriage and cohabitation that include information from both mothers and fathers.
Extant data rarely allow researchers to measure culture directly. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study will address this limitation by providing data on differences in values with respect to pregnancy intentions, families of origin, marital values and cost-benefit perceptions, gender role ideology, and kin relationships.
The welfare reform process is taking shape rapidly, creating strong incentives for parents to remain together. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study will provide critical new information about the impact of these changes for children, e.g. economic gain or loss, greater emotional support or more conflict, more or less involvement of grandparents, etc.
Sampling from the hospital rather than from birth records is done to yield a higher response rate, and concentrating in cities allows for testing for differences in welfare rules, child support practices, and labor market strength across cities.
Visit the project website.
|
| |
| Last Updated |
03/04/05
|
| Type of Summary |
Reviewed
|
| External Reviewer(s) |
Sally Waltman
(Fragile Families Research Team)
|
| Contact(s) |
Sally Waltman (swaltman@princeton.edu)
Fragile Families Research Team
Princeton University
Wallace Hall
(T) (609) 258-5894
(F) (609) 258-5804
|
| Publications Department |
Sally Waltman (swaltman@princeton.edu)
Fragile Families Research Team
Princeton University
Wallace Hall
(T) (609) 258-5894
(F) (609) 258-5804
|
Populations Studied
| Target Population |
Recipients/participants/clients
Non-custodial parents
|
| Subgroups Analyzed |
Single parent families
Two-parent families
Fathers
Children 1-6
Low-income households
Minority populations
|
| Sample Size and Unit |
The sample is comprised of births in a total of 20 U.S. cities with populations over 200,000, including 3, 712 non-marital births and 1,186 marital births. Approximately half of the sample is non-Hispanic black and a third is Hispanic. Time, Love, Cash, Couples, and Children Study: This qualitative sub-study uses 75 couples (one man, one woman) from the sample of Fragile Families.
|
Sites Studied
Austin, Texas
Baltimore, Maryland*
Boston, Massachusetts
Chicago, Illinois
Corpus Christi, Texas
Detroit, Michigan*
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jacksonville, Florida
Milwaukee, Wisconsin*
Nashville, Tennessee
Newark, New Jersey*
New York, New York
Oakland, California*
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Richmond, Virginia
San Antonio, Texas
San Jose, California*
Toledo, Ohio
Norfolk, Virginia
*=not included in the national sample for the National Institute for Child Health and Development
Program Components, Policies, and Activities Evaluated
Employment activities
- Job skills training
- Job readiness activities
- Job search
- Job placement
- Work supplementation programs
- Job development
- Self-employment
Financial disincentives/Sanctions
- Reduced benefits for non-compliance
- Strengthened JOBS sanctions
Program requirements
- Work requirement
- Child support order
- Parenting or social contract
- Immunizations for children
Child support
- Support paid directly to parent
- Increased efficiency in collection
- Child support - misc.
- Services to non-custodial parents
Social/Support services
- Child care
- Health benefits
- Child protection agencies
- Community/social services
Administration/Implementation
- Changes in welfare office environment/culture
- Simplification of program rules and procedures
- Development of partnerships with private organizations
- Program enforcement of sanctions
- Development of new welfare policies
- Administration/Implementation - misc.
Educational activities
- School readiness activities
- Educational Activities - misc.
Time limits
Family caps
Eligibility
| Variation in program components across sites? |
Yes
|
| Notes on program components |
Changes in Child Support: The effects of stronger child support enforcement will be studied in terms of decisions about cohabitation, evasion patterns, child well-being, and other parenting behavior of fathers.
Employment activities:
The effects on parents of the requirements of work to receive welfare benefits will be studied.
Program Operations: Differences in parent relationships, relationships to kin, and parent-child relationships will be studied within the context of varying policy regimes.
Program Requirements: Differences in parent relationships, relationships to kin, and parent-child relationships will be studied as related to particular program requirements.
Social/Support services: Access to health care, use of child care services, contact with child protection agencies, and utilization of other community and social services will be studied.
Time Limits: The effects of the 5 years federal time limit and other state-imposed time limits on welfare receipt will be studied.
|
Outcomes Assessed
Benefit termination
- Due to employment
- Due to marriage
- Due to time limit
Family and relationship outcomes
- Violence in family or other relationships (child abuse and neglect)
- Births/pregnancies
- Fatherhood
- Parent-child interactions
- Family formation and stability/Living arrangements
- Foster care
Employment
- Job readiness/training
- Job attainment
- Job retention
- Job promotion
- Number of hours worked for wages
- Employment - misc.
Income security
- Child support payments
- Earnings
- Food stamps receipt
- Medicaid receipt
- Welfare receipt
Housing
- Residential mobility
- Housing - misc.
Attitudes towards work, welfare, and program
- Attitudes towards work, welfare, and program - misc.
Standard of living
- Standard of living - misc.
Service utilization
- Service utilization - misc.
Sanctions
Program implementation
- Program Implementation - misc.
Emotional well-being
- Emotional well-being - misc.
Health/ physical well-being (including prenatal health)
- Health/ physical well-being - misc.
Financial costs and benefits/cost-effectiveness
- Financial costs and benefits/cost-effectiveness - misc.
Policy changes
Child Outcomes
- Child social/emotional/behavioral outcomes
- Child cognitive (attention, problem solving, memory, language, and vocabulary) outcomes
- Child academic outcomes
- Child overall development
- Child mental/physical health outcomes
Types of Studies
| Type |
Descriptive/Analytical Study
|
| Aim |
To increase understanding of:
1) the capabilities and circumstances of new unwed parents, especially fathers; 2) the nature of the relationships among unwed parents, children, and their extended families; 3) the comparative well-being of unwed parents and their children as opposed to married or divorced families; and 4) the role of policies, labor markets, and cultural differences in the lives, relationships, and well-being of unwed parents and their children.
|
| |
| Type |
Descriptive/Analytical Study
|
| Aim |
Time, Love, Cash, Couples, and Children (TLC3) Study: To seek answers to why so many low-income fathers who are highly motivated to be part of their childs life at birth disappear by the time the child is four.
|
| |
Data Sources
| Source |
Interview
|
| Title |
Interviews, conducted by telephone and in-person.
|
| Sample Characteristics/Data Collection |
4,898amilies, including 3,712 unwed couples and 1,186 married couples.
Initial interviews with mothers within 24 hours of child's birth, with fathers as soon after birth as possible.
Follow-up interviews with both parents when child is 12, 30, and 48 months.
In home child assessment at 48 months.
|
| Sites |
All sites.
|
| Response Rate/Attrition Notes |
Not yet available.
|
| Additional Execution Notes |
Measures the same as those in evaluations of Infant Health and Development Program, Early Head Start Evaluation, Teenage Parent Demonstration Project, and ECLS-Birth Cohort Study.
|
| |
| Source |
Interview
|
| Title |
TLC3 Study: In-depth Interviews
|
| Sample Characteristics/Data Collection |
N=75 families
|
| Sites |
Chicago, IL; Milwaukee, WI; New York, NY.
|
| Response Rate/Attrition Notes |
not reported
|
| Additional Execution Notes |
not reported
|
| |
Findings Available
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
Findings
|
03/01/00:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: A Survey of New Parents
|
|
Interim Descriptive/analytical Findings:
From our initial exploration of the Fragile Families data in Oakland and Austin, three findings stand out. First, parents in fragile families in both cities were highly committed to each other and their child at the time of the birth and had high hopes for their future as a family. The challenge for policymakers and community leaders is to nourish these commitments.
Second, most unmarried parents in both cities were poorly equipped to support their families. The typical father had an income of less than $12,500 a year, the typical mother only $4,000 to $5,000. *In Oakland, nearly one out of four fathers and two out of five methods had not worked in the previous year. Increases in human capital, employment, and earnings are likely to play critical roles in the success of parents in maintaining stable families.
Finally, the majority of unmarried mothers and babies in both cities were healthy. But a substantial number received no prenatal health care and engaged in behaviors generally considered risky during pregnancy. One in ten babies were below normal weight. Improving the health care of all mothers during pregnancy and the health education of both parents should be an important objective of policymakers (11).
|
| |
|
05/01/00:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Questions, Design, and a Few Preliminary Results
|
|
Interim Descriptive/analytical Findings:
From our initial exploration of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study data from Oakland and Austin, three findings stand out. First, parents in fragile families in both cities are initially highly committed to each other and to their children. Half of unmarried parents live together, and another 30 percent are romantically involved. More than two-thirds expect to marry. Eight of ten fathers provided support during the pregnancy, and mope than eight of ten mothers planned to put the fathers name on the childs birth certificate. The overwhelming majority of mothers want the father to be involved in raising their child. The challenge for policymakers and community leaders is to nourish rather than undermine these commitments.
Second, most unmarried parents in both cities are poorly equipped to support their families. The typical fathers has an income of less than $12,500 dollars a year, and the typical mother has only $4,000 to $5,000. The human capital of both parents is low. About half of both mothers and fathers lack a high school degree. Fewer than 20 percent have more than a high school degree. In Oakland, nearly one in four fathers and two in five mothers did not work in the previous year. Increases in human capital, employment, and earnings are likely to play critical roles in the success or failure of parents in maintaining stable families.
Finally, the majority of unmarried mothers in both cities are healthy and bear healthy children. However, 25 percent of these mothers do not receive parental care in the first trimester and more than 10 percent give birth to low-weight babies. Furthermore, 20 percent of mothers drink alcohol, use drugs, or smoke cigarettes during their pregnancies. Improving the health care of all mothers during pregnancy should be an important objective of local policymakers.
|
| |
|
03/01/03:
Fragile Families and Well-Being Study: National Baseline Report
|
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- This report summarizes what we have learned from our initial analysis of the first wave of data on unmarried parents collected in sixteen cities from
April 1998 through November 2000. The national sample consists of 2,670
unmarried couples.
- Unwed parents are committed to each other and to their children at the time
of the birth. Eighty-three percent of unmarried parents are romantically
involved; 50 percent live together. Seventy-three percent of unmarried
mothers say the chances that they will marry the baby's father are
"fifty-fifty" or better. Four-fifths of unmarried fathers provide financial
or other types of support during the pregnancy, and 84 percent of mothers
plan to put the father's name on their child's birth certificate. The
overwhelming majority of mothers want the father to be involved in raising
their child.
- Although they have high hopes for their families, most unmarried parents are
poorly equipped to support themselves and their children. Among those who
reported their employment history, 84 percent of mothers and 98 percent of
fathers worked at some time during the past year. However, nearly three of ten fathers were out of work in the week prior to the interview. In addition, the human capital of both parents is low: 37 percent of mothers and 34 percent of fathers lack a high school degree, and only 31 percent of mothers and 26 percent of fathers have more than a high school degree. Human capital and earnings are likely to play critical roles in the success or failure of these parents in maintaining stable families. In fact, a majority of respondents felt that steady employment of both partners is "very important" to a successful marriage.
- Most unmarried mothers are healthy and bear healthy children. Two-thirds of
mothers report they are in very good or excellent health. However, over
one-fifth of mothers do not receive prenatal care in the first trimester,
and 11 percent have babies that are born below normal weight. Ten percent of mothers drank alcohol, 6 percent used drugs and 21 percent smoked cigarettes at some time during the pregnancy, according to their self-reports.
|
| |
|
11/01/01:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fragile Families, Welfare Reform, and Marriage
|
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings:
Marriage will be an important issue in the upcoming debate over the reauthorization of welfare reform. According to recent studies, both children and adults benefit from mar-rage. Still, one of three children in the U.S. is born to unmarried parents. At the time of birth, most unmarried parents are committed to each other and to their child and have high hopes of marriage and a future together. But these parents face numerous barriers to creating and maintaining a stable family life, including low education and job skills, lack of jobs, and poor relationship skills. Helping these parents achieve their goal of stability will require new ideas and new policies such as providing services that start at birth; treating the parents as a couple rather than as individuals; offering services that promote communication and increase employability; reducing marriage penalties; and making child support enforcement more reasonable for low-income fathers. While some of these ideas have been tried in the past, others have never been fully implemented, and none has been offered as a single, comprehensive package. Because Congress is unlikely to enact a full package of services, the federal government should consider funding state-run demonstrations to ascertain the benefits and costs of the proposed reforms.
|
| |
|
05/01/02:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: A Balancing Act: Sources of Support, Child Care, and Hardship Among Unwed Mothers
|
|
Interim Impact Findings:
In looking at the types of support upon which unmarried mothers rely, we find that the overwhelming majority of mothers received both public and private forms of support.
Two-thirds of the mothers had earnings from work during the year following the birth, regardless of their relationship with the father of their child.
Eighty-nine percent of mothers who are in a relationship but do not live with the father received support from him and 50 percent of the mothers who have little or no contact with the father depended on him for support.
94 percent of all unmarried mothers relied on at least some form of public assistance during the year following the birth of their child, with surprisingly little variation by relationship status.
Though mothers residing with the father are less likely to be dependent on TANF, they are just as likely to be dependent on some form of public support as mothers not living with the father.
|
| |
|
06/01/02:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Living Arrangements of New Unmarried Mothers
|
|
Interim Impact Findings:
Just under half of all unmarried mothers are living with the fathers of their baby at the time of birth.
One third are living in a "nuclear" household - one in which the mother, father and child are living together with no other adults, while 15 percent live with at least one other adult in a "partner plus" arrangement.
Of the 51 percent of unmarried mothers that are not living with the baby's father, two-thirds are living with other adults and one-third are living alone.
Mothers living arrangements are strongly associated with age, education and parity. Mothers under the age of 20 are less likely to live alone or in a nuclear arrangement and are more likely to live with other adults.
Relationship quality and substance abuse are also strongly related to mothers' living arrangements. Mothers who report having a high quality relationship with the father are significantly more likely to cohabit, either in nuclear or partner plus arrangements than mothers who report low quality relationships.
|
| |
|
02/01/02:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Who Should Marry Whom? : Multiple Partner Fertility Among New Parents
|
|
Interim Impact Findings:
Total fertility does not vary greatly by marital status. Married mothers have, on average, 2.02 children whereas unmarried mothers have 2.08 children. In contrast, the prevalence of multiple partner fertility is very different for these two groups.
While only 15 percent of married mothers have children with different fathers, 43 percent of unmarried have children with at least two men.
Mothers in cohabiting and visiting relationships and those not involved with the father of the focal child are equally likely to have children with more than one father.
Of all unmarried mothers with more than one child, almost 70 percent exhibit multiple partner fertility.
Black women are much more likely to exhibit multiple partner fertility than other women. Hispanic women exhibit levels of multiple partner fertility between that of blacks and whites.
In contrast to mothers, fathers exhibit more multiple partner fertility across the entire relationship spectrum.
|
| |
|
02/01/02:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: "Just Get Me to the Church": Assessing Policies to Promote Marriage among Fragile Families
|
|
Interim Impact Findings: "Unlike their effects on mature families, cash benefits increase the odds of family formation (short of marriage) among fragile families and effective child support enforcement increases the odds of marriage. However, the fathers employment status outweighs the effects of these traditional income security policies on family formation, because it affects outcomes all along the hierarchy, including marriage, and its effects are larger. Unlike previous research, our data on previous fertility enables us to separate the effects of previous children in common from multiple partner fertility on family formation. Both significantly affect family formation (though in opposite directions), but even after including these variables, blacks, who are more likely to bring children from previous unions into a new union, have substantially lower odds of cohabitation and marriage than non-Hispanic whites."
|
| |
|
09/01/02:
Mother's Beliefs About Welfare Rules
|
|
Interim Impact Findings: The majority of mothers in the sub sample are either unaware of or do not believe that two parent families can receive welfare. Many (52%) believed that a mother could receive welfare if she was not married and lived with her baby's father. A sizable percentage (19%) thought mothers cohabitating were not eligible and almost one third (29%) replied that they did not know their eligibility. Belief levels vary by the mother's city of residence. Although this issue has not been studied systematically, it is likely that a large part of the variation is due to the policy characteristics of the cities. Results show that black and Hispanic women appear less likely to answer "dont' know" to answers about welfare eligibility requirements than white women. Women who live in cities with more generous welfare subsidies have higher levels of belief; conversely, women who live in cities with harsher sanctioning environments are less likely to believe in two family eligibility. After accounting for a number of personal and policy characteristics, including the quality of the relationship, no association between beliefs about two-parent family eligibility and the decision to cohabitate or marry was found.
|
| |
|
07/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Do Unmarried Parents' Expectations Predict Marital Transitions? Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- In most couples, both parents expect to marry the other parent; when they disagree fathers tend to be more optimistic than mothers.
- Couples are more likely to marry and less likely to separate when both partners see the possibility of marriage in the future.
- Consistent with research on cohabitation, men's expectations appear to influence the transition to marriage more than women's.
- However, unmarried parents are more likely to maintain their romantic relationships if either parent expects to marry.
|
| |
|
09/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Hardship in Marriage and Cohabiting Parent Households: Do Cohabiting Parents Underinvest in Household Public Goods?
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Controlling for income and need, cohabitating couples have higher levels of hardship than do married couples suggesting that they under invest in household goods.
- Differences appeared to be accounted for by differences in factors related to couples' relationship security--- differences in their past relationship investments as well as the degree of conflict and cooperation in their current relationship. Both of these factors could be expected to affect the continuity of their relationship.
- Once these security factors were included in the analysis, the relationship between cohabitation and hardship became non existent.
|
| |
|
09/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence Among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Living in a state with stricter child support enforcement laws does increase the risk of domestic violence among non-cohabitating mothers without a child support order and among mothers on welfare.
- The finding suggests that the stress on the father associated with stricter enforcement regimes and attempts by the father to control the mothers behavior through intimidation may play a role in increasing violence among mothers who have not yet obtained a child support order and that mothers not on welfare are able to bargain for better treatment. At the same time, this finding could imply that the positive effect of enforcement is only temporary and the risk of violence ma fall once an order is established.
- Because we are unable to separate out the mechanisms more finely, we cannot conclude definitively which pathways are or are not important since it is possible that the effects are canceling each other out.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Effects of Child Health on Parents' Relationship Status
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- In the 12-18 months after a child's birth, having a child with poor health decreases the level of commitment in the parents' relationship.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: The Effects of State Policies on TANF Participation
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Over half of the between-city variation in reliance on TANF is explained by benefit levels, work requirements and whether state lifetime limits had hit
- Most (over 95%) of the variation is within rather than between city
- Individual characteristics continue to play very important roles in determining welfare participation.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Mothers' Labor Supply in Fragile Families: The Role of Child Health
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Children's health problems may diminish their families' capacity to invest in their health.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: New Fathers' Labor Supply: Does Child Health Matter
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Having a young child in poor health reduces the fathers' probability of being employed by eight percentage points and that it reduces his work effort by over 5 hours per week.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: TANF Participation and Marriage
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Marriage rates among TANF eligible and ineligible mothers are very low and that TANF participation appears to have only a minimal negative effect on marriage among eligible mothers.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Hardships Among Sanctioned Leavers, Non-Sanctioned Leavers, and TANF Stayers
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- TANF leavers who face sanctions risk high levels of homelessness/eviction, hunger, and financial hardship, and they are more likely than both non-sanctioned leavers and stayers to rely on family or friends for a place to live. These effects persist even after controlling for baseline levels of hardship, numerous individual level characteristics, and state fixed effects.
- Sanctioned leavers are at dramatically high risk for experiencing severe material hardships.
- Sanctioned leavers may also be placing financial burdens
on their family and friends by moving in with them.
- Child hunger was six times as prevalent among sanctioned leavers than among non-sanctioned leavers and TANF stayers.
- In the short term, TANF leavers do not appear to be joining the ranks of the middle class.
- The levels of hardship among non-sanctioned leavers, though much lower than those of sanctioned leavers, are nevertheless quite high and are very close to those of TANF stayers.
|
| |
|
12/01/03:
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Fragile Families and the Marriage Agenda
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Whereas 10 percent of married fathers had spent some time in
jail or prison, over 25 percent of fathers who married after birth and over 40 percent of fathers who did not marry had been incarcerated.
- Not only does incarceration reduce the number of men who are available for marriage, the skills that lead to successful coping in jail or prison are likely to be very different from the skills that lead to a successful relationship. Time spent in jail or prison is likely to undermine the skills that the marriage programs are trying to develop.
- Results indicate that recent incarceration policies may influence marriage patterns.
- Increasing relationship skills is likely to have a small, but significant, effect on marriage.
- Changing attitudes toward marriage and resolving the underlying issues behind women's distrust of men would make the effect even larger.
- The data are not definitive about whether new marriage programs will make children better off. On one hand, poverty rates may be lower but marriage may not change parenting quality much.
|
| |
|
11/01/04:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Complex Families: Documenting the Prevalence and Correlates of Multi-Partnered Fertility in the United States
|
|
Parents who are unmarried at the time of a child’s birth are much more likely to have had a previous child by another partner than parents who are married. Race/ethnicity is strong associated with multi-partnered fertility for both parents, as is mothers’ young age at first birth for mothers, and fathers’ having been previously incarcerated.
|
| |
|
02/28/05:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Risk of Divorce as a Barrier to Marriage
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings
- Results indicate that married parents are more likely to dissolve their relationships when they were younger, had less education, experienced a high level of conflict in their relationship, and when the father has been abusive to the mother among other factors.
- Qualitative information
from a subset of unmarried parents in the study suggests that they delayed marriage when they
identified these “warning signs” of divorce in their relationships.
- regression results
show that unmarried parents with a high predicted probability of divorce had significantly and
substantially lower odds of marriage even after taking other factors strongly related to marriage
into account. Based on this evidence, we conclude that unmarried parents delay marriage when
they perceive a high risk of divorce.
|
| |
|
02/28/05:
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Do Good Partners Make Good Parents? Relationship Quality and Parenting in Married and Unmarried Families
|
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings:
- There was a positive association between relationship quality and parenting among both married and unmarried couples, underscoring previous research on ‘spillover’ in dyadic family relationships.
- Supportiveness is somewhat more strongly linked to parenting than conflict. There were essentially no observed differences by parental gender, marital status or child sex in how
relationship quality affects parenting.
|
| |
Recommendations
Existing Publications
| 01/01/99 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Project Description
|
Columbia U
|
| 01/01/97 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Strengthening Fragile Families Initiative
|
Columbia U
|
| 04/01/99 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Austin, Texas
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/99 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Oakland, California
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/99 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Birth Outcomes, Social Risks and Child Health
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Determinants of Paternal Involvement Among Young Unwed Fathers and the Consequences for Child Wellbeing
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/99 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Factors Explaining the Low Incidence of Low Birthweight Among Mexican Americans
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: A Survey of New Parents
|
IRP
|
| 06/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Dispelling Myths About Unmarried Fathers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Questions, Design, and a Few Preliminary Results
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Sources of Support and Economic Capabilities of New Unwed Mothers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Baltimore, Maryland
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Detroit, Michigan
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Newark, New Jersey
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Philadelphia, PA
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/31/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Richmond, VA
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Do Unmarried Parents' Expectations Predict Marital Transitions? Early Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Health Status and Behaviors of Unwed Fathers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Can The Next Step in Welfare Reform Achieve PRWORA's Forth Goal?: Family Formation in Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Father Involvement in Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Child Support Enforcement and In-Hospital Paternity Establishment in Seven Cities
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Understanding Child Support Trends: Economic, Demographic, and Political Contributions
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Fragile Families Study: Social Policies and Labor Markets in Seven Cities
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Determinants of Parental Involvement Among Unwed Fathers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Background, Research Design, and Sampling Issues
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: High Hopes: Unmarried Parents' Expectations about Marriage at the Time of Their Child's Birth
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Union Formation in Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Educational Attainment in Blended Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Do the Poor Pay More? An Empirical Investigation of Price Dispersion in Food Retailing
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Economic Considerations and Class Size
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Roles of Child Support Enforcement and Welfare in Non-marital Childbearing
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Parents' Judgments about Nonresident Fathers' Obligations and Rights
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fathers Behind Bars
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Unwed Parents or Fragile Families? Implications for Welfare and Child Support Policy
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Are Cohabiting Relationships More Violent than Marriage?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fragile Families and Welfare Reform: Introduction to the Children and Youth Services Review
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Effects of Pyschosocial Risk Factors and Prenatal Intervention on Birth Outcomes of Women in New Jersey's HealthStart Program
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Characteristics and Antecedents of Involvement By Young, Unmarried Fathers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Well-Being Study: National Baseline Report
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Shared Parenting in Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Welfare Reform, Fertility, and Father Involvement
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Father Involvement, Maternal Health Behavior and Infant Health
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Low Birthweight
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Unwed Fathers, the Underground Economy, and Child Support Policy
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: New Parents' Attitudes Towards Fathers' Rights and Obligations
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Milwaukee, WI
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: New York City, NY
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Indianapolis, Indiana
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: Corpus Christi, TX
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: City Report: San Jose, CA
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fragile Families, Welfare Reform, and Marriage
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: A Balancing Act: Sources of Support, Child Care, and Hardship Among Unwed Mothers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Living Arrangements of New Unmarried Mothers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 02/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Who Should Marry Whom? : Multiple Partner Fertility Among New Parents
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 02/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: "Just Get Me to the Church": Assessing Policies to Promote Marriage among Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Strengthening Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Then Comes Marriage? Religion, Race, and Marriage in Urban America
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Focused on Their Families: Religion, Parenting, and Child Well-being
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Role of Welfare in New Parents' Lives
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Effects of Welfare and Child Support Policies on Union Formation
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Characteristics and Antecedents of Involvement By Young, Unmarried Fathers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Racial Differences in Marriage Among New, Unmarried Parents: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The 'M' Word: The Rise and Fall of Interracial Coalitions on Fathers and Welfare Reform
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Can Demographic and Economic Factors Explain the Trend in Teenage Birth Rates from 1985-1996?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Effect of Family Structure on Intergenerational Earnings Mobility
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: A New Look at Unmarried Families: Diversity in Human Capital, Attitudes, and Relationship Quality based on Living Arrangements and Marriage Expectations
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 11/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Privileging the Participant: The Influence of Take-Up Rates in Social Welfare Evaluations
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fragile Families, Father Involvement and Public Policy
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Trends in Intergenerational Earnings Mobility
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Life Without Father: What Happens to the Children
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Poor Relief in Sixteenth Century England
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Taxes and Unmarried Fathers' Participation in the Underground Economy
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Welfare, Child Support, and Labor Markets: Are They Related to Father Involvement?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: For Richer or Poorer?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Cohabitation: An Elusive Concept
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Influence of Depressive Symptoms on Fathers' Behaviors and Attitudes
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 03/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fragile Families and Welfare Reform: Introduction to the Children and Youth Services Review
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Exploring Relationship Satisfactions Using Item Response Theory: A Fathers' Perspective
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Effect of Maternal Employment on Teenage Childbearing
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/01 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Improving Response Rates for a Hard-to-Reach Population
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Economic Status and Health in Childhood: the Origins of the Gradient
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Low Birthweight: Do Unwed Fathers Help?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Economic Considerations and Class Size
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/00 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Mothers and Others: Who Invests in Children's Health?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 08/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Diversity Among Unmarried Parents
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Is Marriage A Viable Objective for Fragile Families?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Multiple Partner Fertility
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Unwed Parents: Myths, Realities, and Policymaking
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: How Do Fathers' Negative Behaviors Shape Relationships with Their Children?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Nature of Unmarried Parents' Relationships: What Do Marriage Expectations Really Mean?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/02 |
Mother's Beliefs About Welfare Rules
|
Princeton U
|
| 01/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Incarceration and the Bonds Among Parents in Fragile Families
|
Princeton U
|
| 12/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing: Does WIC Participation Improve Maternal Investments in Infant Health?"
|
Princeton U
|
| 12/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence Among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Princeton U
|
| 11/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Understanding the Stick (or Is It the Carrot?): The Effect of Welfare Beliefs on Family Formation Decisions
|
Princeton U
|
| 11/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Early Father Involvement in Fragile Families
|
Princeton U
|
| 01/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Union Formation and Dissolution in Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/02 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study:
Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence Among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/03 |
Fragile Familes and Child Well Being Study: Variations in Maternal and Child Wellbeing Among Financially Eligible Mothers by TANF Participation Status
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 01/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Union Formation and Dissolution in Fragile Families
|
Princeton U
|
| 05/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Barriers to Marriage Among Fragile Families
|
Princeton U
|
| 06/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: High Hopes But Even Higher Expectations: The Retreat From Marriage Among Low-Income Couple
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Looking for Murphy Brown: Are College-Educated, Single Mothers Unique?"
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Do Unmarried Parents' Expectations Predict Marital Transitions? Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Is There an Advantage to Being Born to Married versus Cohabiting parents? Differences in Child Behavior
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Differences in Mothering Behaviors in Stable and Unstable Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Do All Unmarried Parents Marry and Separate for the Same Reasons? Union Transitions of Unmarried Parents
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: For Richer or Poorer?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Hardship in Marriage and Cohabiting Parent Households: Do Cohabiting Parents Underinvest in Household Public Goods?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence Among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Fathers Perceptions of Paternal Roles: Variations by Marital Status and Living Arrangement
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Complex Families: Documenting the Prevalence and Correlates of Multi-Partnered Fertility in the United States
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Unmarried African American Fathers Involvement with Their Infants: The Role of Couple Relationships
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence Among Non-Cohabiting Couples
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 10/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: The Effects of Welfare and Child Support Policies on Union Formation
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: The Effects of State Policies on TANF Participation
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Effects of Child Health on Parents' Relationship Status
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Mothers' Labor Supply in Fragile Families: The Role of Child Health
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: New Fathers' Labor Supply: Does Child Health Matter
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: TANF Participation and Marriage
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Hardships Among Sanctioned Leavers, Non-Sanctioned Leavers, and TANF Stayers
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 12/01/03 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Fragile Families and the Marriage Agenda
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/21/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Then Comes Marriage?: Religion, Race, and Marriage in Urban America
|
CRCW
|
| 02/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Hispanic Paradox and Breastfeeding: Does Acculturation Matter? Evidence from the Fragile Families Study
|
CRCW
|
| 02/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: His' and 'Her' Marriage Expectations: Determinants and Consequences
|
CRCW
|
| 04/29/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Gender Differences in Perceptions of Paternal Responsibility
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/29/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Child Support Enforcement Policy and Unmarried Fathers' Employment in the Underground and Regular Economies
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 04/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: The Impact of Child Support on Fertility, Parental Investments and Child Well-being
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Parenting Across Racial and Class Lines: Assortative Mating Patterns of New Parents Who Are Married, Cohabiting, Dating, and No Longer Romantically Involve
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Explaining Racial and Ethnic Differences in Marriage among New, Unwed Parents
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Measuring Cohabitation: Does How, When, and Who You Ask Matter?
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 06/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Do Good Partners Make Good Parents? Relationship Quality and Parenting in Married and Unmarried Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: His' and 'Her' Marriage Expectations: Determinants and Consequences
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Bias in Retrospective Reports of Cohabitation Among New Parents
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: The Relationship Between Family Structure and Mothering Behavior within Racial and Ethnic Groups
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Maternal Stress and Mothering Behaviors in Stable and Unstable Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Marriage Following the Birth of a Child Among Cohabiting and Visiting Parents
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 05/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Whos In and for How Much? The Impact of Definitional Changes on the Prevalence and Outcomes of cohabitation
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Child Support and Father-Child Contact In Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 07/01/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: In-Hospital Paternity Establishment and Father Involvement in Fragile Families
|
Frag. Fam.
|
| 09/26/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Single Mothers, Social Capital, and Work-Family Conflict
|
CRCW
|
| 09/26/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Effects of Child Health on Sources of Public Support
|
CRCW
|
| 10/24/04 |
Fragile Families and Child Well Being Study: Instability in Fragile Families: | |