http://www.researchforum.org/project_general_302.html

Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve
Investigator(s) Claudia Coulton (Case Western Reserve University)
Deborah Daro (Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago)
Sponsor(s) Case Western Reserve University
University of Chicago
Funder(s) Cuyahoga County, Ohio
State of Ohio
Abington Foundation
Eva L. and Joseph M. Bruening Foundation
Cleveland Foundation
Cleveland ClearingHouse Association
George W. Codrington Charitable Foundation
Deanconess Community Foundation
Florence Crittendon Services Fund
Hershey Foundation
Eaton Corporation
Initiatives in Urban Education
Mount Sinai Health Care Foundation
Reinberger Foundation
Saint Luke’s Foundation
Saint Ann Foundation
Sherwick Fund
Billie Howland Steffee Family Fund
Treu-Mart Fund
TRW Foundation
Verizon Foundation
Raymond John Wean Foundation
Thomas H. White Foundation
Woodruff Foundation
United Way Services
Consultant(s) Not applicable
Not applicable
Subcontractor(s) Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center
 
Domain Child/Family
Status Operational with Findings
Duration Oct 2000 -
Type Research and/or Program Evaluation
Goal To evaluate the Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative
Program/Policy Description The Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative is a public/private collaborative effort to promote and improve early intervention and supportive services to all children in the County, from birth through age five. The Initiative consists of five interrelated components: (1) a universal home visitation program for every first-time and teenage mother giving birth in the County [Welcome Home], and an intensive multi-year home visitation program for new parents facing the greatest challenges [Early Start]; (2) improved childcare services, including expanding the network of home-based child care in the County while maintaining quality; (3) enhanced childcare services for children with special needs through training and technical assistance to childcare providers; (4) expanded health insurance coverage of children from low-income, working families; and, (5) a public education campaign to raise awareness of the importance of a child's first few years of life.
Notes No notes reported.
 
Last Updated 10/04/05
Type of Summary Reviewed
External Reviewer(s) Robert L. Fisher (Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve)
Contact(s) Claudia Coulton (cxc10@po.cwru.edu)
Case Western Reserve University
10900 Euclid Avenue
(T) (216)-368-2000
(F) not reported
Publications Department Not applicable (N/A)
(T) N/A
(F) N/A
Not Reported

Populations Studied

Target Population Children
Children younger than 1 (infants)
Subgroups Analyzed Children 1-6
Child care providers
Sample Size and Unit See data section.

Sites Studied

Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Program Components, Policies, and Activities Evaluated

Social/Support services

  • Child care
  • Health benefits
  • Enhanced social and health services
  • Social/Support Services - misc.
  • Home visits
  • Referrals to other service organizations

Administration/Implementation

  • Development of partnerships with private organizations
  • Administration/Implementation - misc.
Variation in program components across sites? Yes
Notes on program components N/A

Outcomes Assessed

Service utilization

  • Service utilization - misc.

Program implementation

  • Program Implementation - misc.
  • Capacity of management systems to meet priorities

Adult outcomes

  • Social functioning/social relationships
  • Adult outcomes - misc.

Child Outcomes

  • Child mental/physical health outcomes

Types of Studies

Type Descriptive/Analytical Study
Aim Systems Change Study: Assess system changes, community wide collaborative relationships and policy changes; examine policy connections and changes; and, analyze children’s involvement with multiple systems.
 
Type Longitudinal/Prospective Study
Aim Family Child Care Home Study: Examine the effect of training and technical assistance on child care quality; and, analyze the family child care system.
 
Type Impact Study (Quasi-experiment with non-equivalent control groups)
Aim Population Outcomes Study: Examine outcomes among all young children in Cuyahoga County, including rates of child abuse and neglect; health insurance coverage for young children; family self-sufficiency; enrollment in certified child care and Head Start/ Preschool; and child death rates.
 
Type Descriptive/Analytical Study
Aim Special Needs Child Care Study Study the size, capacity and location of the special needs child care system in the County; Study training and TA providers to determine the type of training and TA they are providing and to whom; Study special needs child care referral requests to determine portals of entry and extent to which needs are met; and, Assess training and technical assistance are being used for children with special needs.
 
Type Descriptive/Analytical Study
Aim Healthy Start/Medicaid Expansion Study: study Healthy Start/ Medicaid enrollment trends and patterns for children ages 0-5; analyze service utilization and provider and HMO enrollment including continuity of care, immunization rates and well child care; and, describe Healthy Start/ Medicaid outreach activities
 
Type Impact Study (Quasi-experiment with pre-post time periods)
Aim Home Visiting Studies: Assess participant, program impacts (such as parental stress, parental support, parenting, home environment; Analyze participant engagement and retention in Early Start; assess subsequent reports for child abuse and neglect; and, Assess quality and consistency of Early Start services delivered by different community based agencies.
 

Data Sources

Source Administrative data
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection Systems Change Study: All children born during and after 1992 Special Needs Study: Special needs children HS/Medicaid Expansion Study: Children 0-5
Sites Cuyahoga County
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 
Source Interview
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection Systems Change Study: 50 key informants HS/Medicaid Expansion Study: "selected" staff
Sites Agencies overseeing each component of the project, their subcontractors, and partners
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 
Source Survey
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 800 families
Sites Two Early Start referral sources: Welcome Home and Ohio Works First
Additional Execution Notes Administered 1 month and 12 months post-enrollment
 
Source Field Research
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection Random sample of 100 Starting Point providers
Sites Family Child Care Homes
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes Conducted immediately following certification, 7 and 13 months following
 
Source Survey
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection Home Visiting Study: 800 families
Family Child Care Home Studies: Random sample of 100 Starting Point providers (same providers that were observed as part of FCCHS
Sites Home Visiting Study: Two Early Start referaral sources: Welcome Home and Ohio Works First
Family Child Care Studies: Family Child Care Homes
Response Rate/Attrition Notes Home Visiting Study: all families who agree to participate
Additional Execution Notes Family Child Care Home Studies: conducted after 1st and 3rd observations
 
Source Focus Group
Sample Characteristics/Data Collection 2 groups of providers who care for special-needs children; 2 groups of parents of special-needs children
Sites Not reported.
Response Rate/Attrition Notes N/A
Additional Execution Notes No notes reported.
 

Findings Available

Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings

Findings

11/01/01: Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Early Childhood Initiative Evaluation and Research Interim Report
Interim Descriptive/Analytical Findings:

Population Indicators Study:

  • Abuse and neglect: Child abuse and neglect rates for children under 6 were consistent throughout the ’90s. It is too early to observe any reduction in these rates as the ECI went into effect only in 1999. However, recent birth cohorts show a slightly lower chance of experiencing a second incident of maltreatment within two years, a trend that suggests, if it continues, the ECI may be having a preventative effect.
  • Health insurance coverage: A large improvement occurred in health insurance coverage, both privately and publicly funded, for young children between 1998 and 2001, with the estimated percent of uninsured children under age 6 falling markedly from 10.5 percent to 2.1 percent.
  • Poverty rate. Although 2000 Census data are not yet available, child poverty in Cuyahoga County is likely to have fallen slightly from the 1990 rate of 24 percent, consistent with national trends attributable to welfare reform and a strong economy during the period. The percentage of children under age 6 who were on cash welfare in the County fell from almost 40 percent in 1992 to 15 percent in 2000. Although most of these former welfare families have higher incomes than they did on welfare, more than half remain near the poverty line, and this economic reality is a reason the ECI is needed now more than ever.
  • Regulated child care. Enrollment of children under age 3 in regulated child care has nearly doubled since the inception of the ECI. About one-third of these children are subsidized by vouchers.
  • Preschool attendance. In 2001, 76 percent of 3 and 4 year-olds were enrolled in some type of preschool program, including Head Start, public preschool, private preschools or combined child care and preschool programs. This is much higher than the national preschool enrollment rate of 57 percent.
  • Death rate. The number of deaths among children under age 6 continued to fall throughout the decade.
  • Other significant demographic trends. The persistence of high rates of low birth weight, despite the leveling of teen and out-of-wedlock births, supports the decision of the ECI to pilot a prenatal program.
  • System and Policy Change Study:

  • Level of collaboration: New collaboration between private and public funders has led to a more unified vision for systemic change and the funding to sustain it; increased cooperation among program implementers has decreased service duplication and improved service integration and efficiency.
  • Policy development:: Service delivery planning has been transformed to meet specific needs and engage in problem solving around how to integrate services for young children and families. The promise of the ECI has been recognized outside the County as well, and some programmatic components are in fact serving as a model for the State of Ohio. The ECI has also become a magnet for a variety of additional projects and resources that have the potential to further its aims and vision.
  • Needed system changes: Increased efforts are needed to raise public awareness about the ECI and to ensure that service providers can effectively communicate information about the system to parents. Internal communication among contractors and between contractors and the ECI could be improved. Attention to transitions between programs for birth and age 3, age 3 to 5, and kindergartners is needed. Key informants express the need to secure the financial, political and structural sustainability of the ECI.
  • Home Visitation Studies

  • Service coverage: Since July 1999, Welcome Home visits have been provided to almost 14,000 new and teen parents, a number that represents more than 88 percent of all new and teen births in the County. Since July 1999, more than 13,000 families have been referred to Early Start.
  • Client satisfaction: More than 90 percent of Welcome Home participants responding to a County-administered consumer survey reported satisfaction with the home visiting service. Virtually all Welcome Home participants interviewed as part of the evaluation expressed high praise for the nurse visit and did not express unmet needs.
  • Types of families served: The evaluation sample mirrors the characteristics of the broad pool of families who are receiving both Welcome Home and Early Start visits in terms of problems presented, location of the home and source of referral. Families eligible for Early Start present a range of demographic, environmental, social and developmental risk factors that place their children at increased risk for abuse or other negative outcomes. In fact, families referred to Early Start from Welcome Home and Ohio Works First (the County welfare program) have an elevated risk for maltreatment. Neither group appears to be at the highest end of the risk continuum, however.
  • Service delivery: Over time, it appears families are engaging in Early Start services closer to the birth of their children and receiving a higher proportion of planned services. However, as with other intensive home visitation services that have been studied nationally, families receive only about half of the intended service dosage.
  • Staff satisfaction and training. Home visitors and supervisors are well educated and generally satisfied with Early Start. More than 75 percent of staff were satisfied with their agency’s management of Welcome Home and Early Start. A sizable proportion of home visitors (and supervisors) reported no prior experience in delivering home visitation services. This finding suggests that expanded training and support may be necessary to insure that the model is implemented as designed.
  • Family Child Care Homes Study:

  • Service coverage: Since July 1999, 1,433 new family child care homes have been trained and certified, representing nearly a 150 percent increase in the number of certified child care homes in the County. (The number of certified homes as of June 30, 1999 was 963.) Approximately nine percent of these new providers have withdrawn from the service network, a much lower rate of attrition than that found in other studies of family child care (30-40%).
  • Training provided: Of the homes that have been certified to date, 84 percent have received post-certification technical assistance and 56 percent have received visits related to quality enhancement.
  • Turnover rates: Of the 1,433 new homes certified under the ECI, 127 or 9 percent have left the program. This rate of turnover is one-half to one-third of that noted in other published studies of family child care providers.
  • Quality improvement: Quality improvement cannot be judged yet, since only baseline ratings have been made. Prior to receiving technical assistance (i.e., baseline), the new family child care homes fell into the poor range on the Family Day Care Rating Scale, suggesting that the ECI is potentially addressing an existing need for quality improvement.
  • Special Needs Child Care Study:

  • Increased capacity: An estimated 68 child care programs served children with special needs in the County before the ECI began; now there are an estimated 170 such programs. In addition, between December 2000 and June 2001, the number of family child care homes providing care for a child with special needs increased from 27 to 36 homes. Additionally, the number of providers who expressed willingness to serve children with special needs increased from 256 to 339.
  • Training provided: In total, 429 individual child care providers made 717 requests for training on special needs, which were handled during the period of January 2000 to March 2001. There is no clear pattern over the five quarters examined, however, that providers are attending training sessions on a range of subjects related to special needs child care. Of the children on whose behalf technical assistance was delivered, seven visits were delivered on average per child and 21 visits per child care program.
  • Stabilization of care: The available data provides limited information about whether the ECI training program has stabilized care for the special needs children on behalf of whom it has been provided, although focus group attendees agreed that technical assistance can be an essential tool in helping them accommodate special needs children.
  • Client satisfaction: Providers and parents report that the technical assistance provided by community-based agencies made a substantial difference in the quality of care provided to special needs children. In addition, the views of focus group participants suggest that there are now an adequate number of child care spaces available for these children.
  • Unmet needs: Data from focus groups suggest the need for (1) enhancements in public welfare caseworkers’ knowledge about children with special needs; (2) increases in the level of child care reimbursement for children with special needs; (3) a centralized source of information for families related to children with special needs; and (4) a mechanism for linking parents with providers who offer high-quality child care for children with special needs.
  • Healthy Start/Medicaid Expansion Study:

  • Indicators of expanded coverage: The 1998 Ohio Family Health Survey found that 12.5 percent of children 18 years and under and 10.5 percent of those age 5 and under in Cuyahoga County lacked health insurance. A follow-up survey in 2001 found that the number of uninsured children 18 years and under in the County had declined to 7.4 percent. Only 2.1 percent of children age 5 and under were uninsured by 2001.
  • Medicaid enrollment and outreach: almost uninterrupted increase in the enrollment of younger children since December 1999, with a dramatic increase beginning in September 2000. Enrollment for older children has increased substantially since September 2000, as well. Recent data from Cuyahoga Health & Nutrition (County department) show an increase in the average monthly call volume on the Healthy Start hotline since January 2000, as well as an increase in the average number of Medicaid applications received per month from all sources.
  • Stability of coverage: Preliminary analysis found that Medicaid enrollment began earlier and spells of uninterrupted eligibility increased in duration for children born after mid-1999 as compared to children born prior to mid-1999. This suggests a trend toward more stable coverage for young children.
  • Population Indicators Study:
  • Abuse and neglect: Child abuse and neglect rates for children under 6 were consistent throughout the ’90s. It is too early to observe any reduction in these rates as the ECI went into effect only in 1999. However, recent birth cohorts show a slightly lower chance of experiencing a second incident of maltreatment within two years, a trend that suggests, if it continues, the ECI may be having a preventative effect.
  • Health insurance coverage: A large improvement occurred in health insurance coverage, both privately and publicly funded, for young children between 1998 and 2001, with the estimated percent of uninsured children under age 6 falling markedly from 10.5 percent to 2.1 percent.
  • Poverty rate. Although 2000 Census data are not yet available, child poverty in Cuyahoga County is likely to have fallen slightly from the 1990 rate of 24 percent, consistent with national trends attributable to welfare reform and a strong economy during the period. The percentage of children under age 6 who were on cash welfare in the County fell from almost 40 percent in 1992 to 15 percent in 2000. Although most of these former welfare families have higher incomes than they did on welfare, more than half remain near the poverty line, and this economic reality is a reason the ECI is needed now more than ever.
  • Regulated child care. Enrollment of children under age 3 in regulated child care has nearly doubled since the inception of the ECI. About one-third of these children are subsidized by vouchers.
  • Preschool attendance. In 2001, 76 percent of 3 and 4 year-olds were enrolled in some type of preschool program, including Head Start, public preschool, private preschools or combined child care and preschool programs. This is much higher than the national preschool enrollment rate of 57 percent.
  • Death rate. The number of deaths among children under age 6 continued to fall throughout the decade.
  • Other significant demographic trends. The persistence of high rates of low birth weight, despite the leveling of teen and out-of-wedlock births, supports the decision of the ECI to pilot a prenatal program.
  • System and Policy Change Study:

  • Level of collaboration: New collaboration between private and public funders has led to a more unified vision for systemic change and the funding to sustain it; increased cooperation among program implementers has decreased service duplication and improved service integration and efficiency.
  • Policy development:: Service delivery planning has been transformed to meet specific needs and engage in problem solving around how to integrate services for young children and families. The promise of the ECI has been recognized outside the County as well, and some programmatic components are in fact serving as a model for the State of Ohio. The ECI has also become a magnet for a variety of additional projects and resources that have the potential to further its aims and vision.
  • Needed system changes: Increased efforts are needed to raise public awareness about the ECI and to ensure that service providers can effectively communicate information about the system to parents. Internal communication among contractors and between contractors and the ECI could be improved. Attention to transitions between programs for birth and age 3, age 3 to 5, and kindergartners is needed. Key informants express the need to secure the financial, political and structural sustainability of the ECI.
  • Home Visitation Studies

  • Service coverage: Since July 1999, Welcome Home visits have been provided to almost 14,000 new and teen parents, a number that represents more than 88 percent of all new and teen births in the County. Since July 1999, more than 13,000 families have been referred to Early Start.
  • Client satisfaction: More than 90 percent of Welcome Home participants responding to a County-administered consumer survey reported satisfaction with the home visiting service. Virtually all Welcome Home participants interviewed as part of the evaluation expressed high praise for the nurse visit and did not express unmet needs.
  • Types of families served: The evaluation sample mirrors the characteristics of the broad pool of families who are receiving both Welcome Home and Early Start visits in terms of problems presented, location of the home and source of referral. Families eligible for Early Start present a range of demographic, environmental, social and developmental risk factors that place their children at increased risk for abuse or other negative outcomes. In fact, families referred to Early Start from Welcome Home and Ohio Works First (the County welfare program) have an elevated risk for maltreatment. Neither group appears to be at the highest end of the risk continuum, however.
  • Service delivery: Over time, it appears families are engaging in Early Start services closer to the birth of their children and receiving a higher proportion of planned services. However, as with other intensive home visitation services that have been studied nationally, families receive only about half of the intended service dosage.
  • Staff satisfaction and training. Home visitors and supervisors are well educated and generally satisfied with Early Start. More than 75 percent of staff were satisfied with their agency’s management of Welcome Home and Early Start. A sizable proportion of home visitors (and supervisors) reported no prior experience in delivering home visitation services. This finding suggests that expanded training and support may be necessary to insure that the model is implemented as designed.
  • Family Child Care Homes Study:

  • Service coverage: Since July 1999, 1,433 new family child care homes have been trained and certified, representing nearly a 150 percent increase in the number of certified child care homes in the County. (The number of certified homes as of June 30, 1999 was 963.) Approximately nine percent of these new providers have withdrawn from the service network, a much lower rate of attrition than that found in other studies of family child care (30-40%).
  • Training provided: Of the homes that have been certified to date, 84 percent have received post-certification technical assistance and 56 percent have received visits related to quality enhancement.
  • Turnover rates: Of the 1,433 new homes certified under the ECI, 127 or 9 percent have left the program. This rate of turnover is one-half to one-third of that noted in other published studies of family child care providers.
  • Quality improvement: Quality improvement cannot be judged yet, since only baseline ratings have been made. Prior to receiving technical assistance (i.e., baseline), the new family child care homes fell into the poor range on the Family Day Care Rating Scale, suggesting that the ECI is potentially addressing an existing need for quality improvement.
  • Special Needs Child Care Study:

  • Increased capacity: An estimated 68 child care programs served children with special needs in the County before the ECI began; now there are an estimated 170 such programs. In addition, between December 2000 and June 2001, the number of family child care homes providing care for a child with special needs increased from 27 to 36 homes. Additionally, the number of providers who expressed willingness to serve children with special needs increased from 256 to 339.
  • Training provided: In total, 429 individual child care providers made 717 requests for training on special needs, which were handled during the period of January 2000 to March 2001. There is no clear pattern over the five quarters examined, however, that providers are attending training sessions on a range of subjects related to special needs child care. Of the children on whose behalf technical assistance was delivered, seven visits were delivered on average per child and 21 visits per child care program.
  • Stabilization of care: The available data provides limited information about whether the ECI training program has stabilized care for the special needs children on behalf of whom it has been provided, although focus group attendees agreed that technical assistance can be an essential tool in helping them accommodate special needs children.
  • Client satisfaction: Providers and parents report that the technical assistance provided by community-based agencies made a substantial difference in the quality of care provided to special needs children. In addition, the views of focus group participants suggest that there are now an adequate number of child care spaces available for these children.
  • Unmet needs: Data from focus groups suggest the need for (1) enhancements in public welfare caseworkers’ knowledge about children with special needs; (2) increases in the level of child care reimbursement for children with special needs; (3) a centralized source of information for families related to children with special needs; and (4) a mechanism for linking parents with providers who offer high-quality child care for children with special needs.
  • Healthy Start/Medicaid Expansion Study:

  • Indicators of expanded coverage: The 1998 Ohio Family Health Survey found that 12.5 percent of children 18 years and under and 10.5 percent of those age 5 and under in Cuyahoga County lacked health insurance. A follow-up survey in 2001 found that the number of uninsured children 18 years and under in the County had declined to 7.4 percent. Only 2.1 percent of children age 5 and under were uninsured by 2001.
  • Medicaid enrollment and outreach: almost uninterrupted increase in the enrollment of younger children since December 1999, with a dramatic increase beginning in September 2000. Enrollment for older children has increased substantially since September 2000, as well. Recent data from Cuyahoga Health & Nutrition (County department) show an increase in the average monthly call volume on the Healthy Start hotline since January 2000, as well as an increase in the average number of Medicaid applications received per month from all sources.
  • Stability of coverage: Preliminary analysis found that Medicaid enrollment began earlier and spells of uninterrupted eligibility increased in duration for children born after mid-1999 as compared to children born prior to mid-1999. This suggests a trend toward more stable coverage for young children.
  •  
    02/01/03: Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative Evaluation: Phase I Final Report, Entire Report
    Final Descriptive/Analytical Findings:

    Capacity and Systems Findings:

    • In 2.5 years of operation, the ECI reached nearly 83,000 Cuyahoga County children (prenatal through five years of age), and approximately 68% of children born since the start of ECI have received one or more ECI services. Since the start of ECI, Welcome Home visits have been made to over 19,700 new and teen parents, representing 86 percent of all those eligible for the service.
    • Since the launch of ECI, 15,441 children, 69% under six months of age, have been referred for Early Start services.
    • The Family Child Care Homes program led to the certification of 1,499 new home-based child care providers, a 150% increase since the start of the Initiative, and 74% of these providers received technical support visits.
    • The Special Needs Child Care program has delivered technical assistance on behalf or nearly 1,200 children with special needs [based on data from families that consented to participate in the evaluation], trained over 900 providers, and helped more than 250 families through placement assistance.
    • From the perspective of a sample of key informants, the Initiative has facilitated a cultural shift among the organizations involved to create a coordinated response to children's needs, established formal, structured collaborations that did not previously exist, facilitated cross-system referrals, and developed new linkages between communitybased agencies and families across the County.
    • From the perspective of a sample of key informants, however, some barriers remain, including concerns about long-term political support, long-term funding, and the availability of a sufficient and qualified labor pool.

    Outcome Findings:

    • Enrollment of children under age 3 in regulated child care increased by 25% since the inception of the ECI, and 76% of 3- and 4- year-olds were enrolled in some type of preschool in 2001, compared to 57% nationally.
    • Welcome Home visits provided participants useful information in identifying health and related resources for their children and in offering guidance in basic child care strategies.
    • A greater number of Early Start services had modest predictive ability in explaining a participant’s reduced risk for physical abuse and increased sense of competence and comfort in caring for her child.
    • Over the three years, family child care provider income increased 58%, on average, and the mean number of children in care increased by 53% (from 3.0 to 4.6 children).
    • The receipt of TA and training related to caring for children with special needs was found to be associated with a greater willingness to care for children with special needs.
    • Eighty percent of children with special needs whose caregivers received TA remained in their child care placement for six months or more.
    • The percent of medically uninsured children under age 6 in Cuyahoga County decreased from 10 percent to 2 percent between 1998 and 2001 (latest data available).
    • The proportion of infants enrolled in Medicaid who received a well-baby visit within the first month of life increased from 30% to 43% between 1998 and 2001, and the proportion receiving the intended five visits during the first year of life nearly doubled (from 11% to 21%).
    Final Implementation/Process Findings:

    Service Provision and Quality Findings:

    • Infants are being served earlier in life as the Initiative progresses, with 63% of infants being served by three months of age in the most recent birth cohorts.
    • More children born in 2000 were identified as needing Early Intervention services and were identified at an earlier age than prior to the Initiative.
    • Similarly, Early Start home visits are being delivered much earlier in infants’ lives, such that infants referred for service before their 6- month birthday receive an initial home visit within the first month of life.
    • Early Start referrals with the highest level of risk are twice as likely to receive an initial home visit and engage in the program as those referrals with fewer presenting problems.
    • On average, over a 9-month period Early Start families received 11.3 visits, approximately half the number of intended home visits, comparable to service levels achieved in similar early intervention programs.
    • Improving the quality of care in family child care homes proved difficult. Over a 12-month period, the overall quality of care remained poor in a sample of family child care homes. However, the retention of quality was found to be correlated with factors that could be influenced by policymakers: a greater number of technical assistance visits, seeking providers with limited child caregiving experience pre-certification, and fewer children in care.
    • During ECI, the percentage of children enrolling in Medicaid during the first month of life increased from 45% to 62%, and the percentage disenrolling within 13 months after initial enrollment decreased from 36% to 25%.
     
    10/01/04: Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Welcome Home and Early Start
    Interim Implementation Findings:
    • Three months after receiving their visit, Welcome Home participants report remembering and using the infant care information given to them by the nurse.
    • Newborns and their parents are being provided ongoing home visitation services much earlier in the infant’s life than had been true in 1999.
    • On average, all new parents, regardless of personal and economic resources, appear to experience a significant loss in their sense of emotional connection and belonging to those in their informal support network and an increase in perceived stress, underscoring the importance of universal support.
    • Early Start referrals who present the highest level of risk, as measured by the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP), are twice as likely to receive an initial home visit and engage in the program as those with the lowest CAP scores. However, about one-third of all referrals never receive a home visit.
    • The average Early Start participant who received a minimum of 15 visits demonstrated significant improvement in her level of depression, perception of stress, and sense of competence and comfort in caring for her child.
    • Retention in Early Start, and consequently more home visits, is far more likely if the participant and home visitor are able to establish a strong relationship based on a mutual understanding of the purpose of Early Start and a mutual respect for what each can bring to the service relationship.
    • Enrollment and retention rates varied across Early Start service providers.
    • Significant and persistent differences in Early Start service duration and dosage existed between African American and non-African American participants.
    • In the first 6 months following enrollment in the study, approximately 6 percent of the total sample and 8 percent of those referred to Early Start were reported for suspected child abuse and neglect.
     
    05/01/05: Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Phase II Final Report Executive Summary
    Final Descriptive/Analytical Findings:
    • A community-wide network of services for young children and their families has been established, and the apparatus of county government has been altered to directly support and coordinate early childhood services.
    • More children under age six in Cuyahoga County are receiving needed services at earlier ages than ever before.
    • Children and their parents are beginning to show benefits from the services provided through the initiative.
    • Efforts to deepen and extend the services, tailor them to individual needs, and assure continuing quality should continue.
    • The public and private partners who established this Initiative have maintained their commitment for half a decade and recently recommitted to it, with a new strategic plan that outlines a continued focus on program improvement based on evaluation.
     

    Recommendations

    Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Early Childhood Initiative Evaluation and Research Interim Report (11/01/01)
    1. Continue the use of effective outreach efforts in enrolling eligible children into Healthy Start/Medicaid;
    2. Expand and enhance prenatal services, given the persistent trend of low birth weight babies in Cuyahoga County;
    3. Increase public awareness of the ECI campaign and its components to encourage families to take advantage of its services and to engender broader public support of the Initiative;
    4. Assess the degree to which the home visitation programs (Welcome Home and Early Start) are reaching those children and families most at risk;
    5. Stress the area of basic care in quality enhancement visits to newly certified family child care homes;
    6. Evaluate the different service delivery models being used to address child care for children with special needs to help tailor the ECI training to effectively meet the needs of children on whose behalf the training is provided;
    7. Continue to build management information systems to support high-quality service delivery and ongoing evaluation activities.
     
    Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: The Early Start Program- An Assessment of Program Quality (10/01/04)
    • Need to recognize that there is a great variation in resources, supports, flexibility, and ability to implement program standards among Early Start agencies.
    • Need for greater clarity and consistency among Early Start providers in documenting what happens in home visits and the services provided to families.
    • Use of peer review and collaboration strategies among Early Start agencies to help enhance quality in documentation and record-keeping.
    • Need to consolidate essential data elements to streamline data collection and administrative compliance procedures.
    • Need for Early Start to ensure consistent, quality supervision and training because of formal preparation, in-service training, and supervision is not consistent among agencies.
    • May need to develop a fine-tuned program model and a reconsider program costs for a more consistent, quality program.
    • Need improved linkages to community resources, better collaboration among county service systems, and the development of new public/private partnerships.
     
    Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Welcome Home and Early Start (10/01/04)
    • More directed assistance to Early Start agencies in the area of participant recruitment, staff development, and supervision.
    • Greater emphasis on strengthening social networks in structuring both Welcome Home and Early Start services.
    • Improved linkages among the ECI system, OWF and child protective services.
    • Increased thought to the role personal experiences and cultural backgrounds play in defining the participant-worker relationship.
     
    Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Phase II Final Report Executive Summary (05/01/05)
    • Develop supplemental approaches to home-based strategies, involving individualized services tailored to caregiver characteristics, to engage (1) more at-risk families, and (2) family child care providers.
    • Develop a system to identify and intervene with families with a young child who lacks a consistent source of medical care (i.e., a medical home)
    • Promote quality improvement strategies for family child care and home visiting that include attracting qualified and motivated individuals to deliver services
    • Continue supports and services for children with special needs
    • Continue efforts to expand newborn home visiting beyond first time and teen parents
    • Advocate for high quality preschool programs and universal pre-kindergarten programs.
     

    Existing Publications

    11/01/01 Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Early Childhood Initiative Evaluation and Research Interim Report CUPSC, CWRU
    02/01/03 Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative Evaluation: Phase I Final Report, Entire Report CUPSC, CWRU
    02/01/03 Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative Evaluation: Phase I Final Report: Executive Summary CUPSC, CWRU
    10/01/04 Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Welcome Home and Early Start Chapin Hall
    10/01/04 Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: The Early Start Program- An Assessment of Program Quality Chapin Hall
    05/01/05 Cuyahoga County Early Childhood Initiative: Phase II Final Report Executive Summary CWRU