|
http://www.researchforum.org/project_general_416.html |
|
|
How Well Have Rural and Small Metropolitan Labor MarketsAbsorbed Welfare Recipients?
General Information
View a brief abstract of this project.
| Evaluator(s) |
Lewin Group |
| Investigator(s) |
Mary Farrell
(Lewin Group)
|
| Domain |
Income Security/TANF Community/Neighborhood |
| Status | Completed (final report released) |
| Type |
Research and/or Program Evaluation |
| Program/Policy Description | Following welfare policy changes in the 90s, concerns have been expressed about whether enough jobs will be available to employ the additional welfare recipients entering the labor market as a result of welfare reform. If a surplus of jobs is not available in particular areas, welfare recipients’ entry into the labor force might reduce low-skill wages and displace some workers. There is also a great concern about the impact of welfare reform on rural and small metropolitan labor markets, because these markets might be less able to absorb the inflow of welfare recipients than urban labor markets. To address these concerns, this project examines how well rural and small metropolitan labor markets can absorb welfare recipients, and to the extent feasible, estimate the impact of welfare reform on rural and small-metropolitan regions since 1993. This study uses an economic model to estimate the impact of welfare reform and improvements in the economy on the low-skill labor market, where most welfare recipients seek work. The basic approach began by comparing estimates of the number of welfare recipients entering the labor market to changes in the low-skill labor force in each of the regions. Were there enough jobs to absorb the increase of welfare recipients who left for work or who combined welfare and work? Researchers then attempted to estimate the effect of the welfare push on employment and wages in each of the regions and distinguish between entry due to reforms (“welfare push”) and entry due to the strong economy (“demand pull”). |
| Notes | No notes reported. |
| Last Updated | 08/06/03 |
| Type of Summary | Unreviewed |
| Contact(s) |
Mary Farrell (not reported)
Lewin Group 3130 Fairview Park Drive Suite 800 (T) (703) 269-5500 (F) (703)269-5501 |
| Submitter(s) |
Research Forum Staff (info@researchforum.org)
National Center for Children In Poverty 215 West 125th St, 3rd Fl (T) (646)284-9600 (F) not reported |
Populations Studied
| Target Population |
Recipients/participants/clients General population Low-income households |
| Subgroups Analyzed |
Rural Populations |
| Sample Size and Unit | General population in the 12 study sites |
| Execution | not reported. |
Sites Studied
12 sites which include a mix of rural and small metropolitan areas.Decatur and Florence, AL;
Rural MS;
Central OR;
Medford-Ashland, OR;
Joplin, MO;
Florence, SC;
Southeast MO;
VT;
Jamestown, NY;
Eau Claire, WI;
North Country, NY;
Wausau, WI.
Program Components, Policies, and Activities Evaluated
Employment activities
Program requirements
Administration/Implementation
| Variation in program components across sites? | No |
Outcomes Assessed
Standard of living
Income security
Employment
Community Outcomes
Types of Studies
| Type | Descriptive/Analytical Study |
Data Sources
| Source | Administrative data |
| Source | Secondary data |
Findings Available
Final Descriptive/Analytical FindingsRecommendations
Existing Publications
| 04/01/01 | How Well Have Rural and Small Metropolitan Labor Markets Absorbed Welfare Recipients?: Final Report | Lewin |
|
|